翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Continuous mapping theorem
・ Continuous marine broadcast
・ Continuous Media Markup Language
・ Continuous Ministry
・ Continuous Ministry (New Zealand)
・ Continuous Ministry (Queensland)
・ Continuous modelling
・ Continuous monitoring
・ Continuous motion pot washing
・ Continuous murmurs
・ Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure
・ Continuous obsolescence
・ Continuous operation
・ Continuous optimization
・ Continuous partial attention
Continuous passive motion
・ Continuous Payment Authority
・ Continuous performance task
・ Continuous phase modulation
・ Continuous Plankton Recorder
・ Continuous positive airway pressure
・ Continuous predicate
・ Continuous production
・ Continuous productive urban landscape
・ Continuous Progress Mathematics
・ Continuous q-Hahn polynomials
・ Continuous q-Hermite polynomials
・ Continuous q-Jacobi polynomials
・ Continuous q-Laguerre polynomials
・ Continuous q-Legendre polynomials


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Continuous passive motion : ウィキペディア英語版
Continuous passive motion (CPM) devices are used during the first phase of rehabilitation following a soft tissue surgical procedure or trauma. The goals of phase 1 rehabilitation are: control post-operative pain, reduce inflammation, provide passive motion in a specific plane of movement, and protect the healing repair or tissue. CPM is carried out by a CPM device, which constantly moves the joint through a controlled range of motion; the exact range is dependent upon the joint, but in most cases the range of motion is increased over time.CPM is used following various types of reconstructive joint surgery such as knee replacement and ACL reconstruction. Its mechanisms of action for aiding joint recovery are dependent upon what surgery is performed. One mechanism is the movement of synovial fluid to allow for better diffusion of nutrients into damaged cartilage, and diffusion of other materials out; such as blood and metabolic waste products. Another mechanism is the prevention of fibrous scar tissue formation in the joint, which tends to decrease the range of motion for a joint. The concept was created by Robert B. Salter M.D in 1970 and, along with help from engineer John Saringer, a device was created in 1978.==CPM Following Knee Arthroplasty==There are contradicting studies in regards to knee CPMs. Unfortunately, many insurance companies, doctor's offices, and other medical establishments do not want to claim financial responsibility for these medical devices, especially in the United States. That being said, some research concludes that CPMs do not help the recovery process. However, these studies are designed to make CPMs fail. For example, CPMs used in conjunction with physical therapy yielded the same results as physical therapy alone. However, in this study, physical therapy was administered to patients twice a day for 18 days http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/60. The usual PT prescription for a TKA is only twice per WEEK http://www.uwhealth.org/files/uwhealth/docs/sportsmed/RE-38789-14_TKA_OP.pdf. Even so, this CPM condemning study had to report their findings in favor of CPM use due to ..."improved short-term range of motion in patients with limited range of motion at the time of discharge after total knee arthroplasty when added to a semi-regular PT program.".http://www.uwhealth.org/files/uwhealth/docs/sportsmed/RE-38789-14_TKA_OP.pdfSome CPM investigations have yielded negative feelings and results towards CPM use is due to poor usage of the device http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745449/. CPM efficacy is contingent on the presence of larger motion arcs. Surprisingly, the range of motion (RoM) the knee actually experiences while in a CPM machine has experienced only 68%-76% of the programmed CPM arc. These percentages should be increased throughout the rehabilitation process, but many healthcare providers fail to follow up adequately with patients regarding this vital step of the recovery process CPMs are extremely effective in pain management. Continuous motion of a joint allows for synovial fluid to be naturally pumped throughout it. This leads to efficient nutrient delivery to the damaged area, reduced inflammation, and overall reduced pain http://nemsi.uchc.edu/clinical_services/orthopaedic/totaljoint/total_knee.html. A study led by Dr. Rajesh N. Maniar, MS, MCh found little difference between a very short- term study (only 3 days) the recovery of patients who did and did not use a CPM. However, he removed pain as a contributing factor http://www.arthroplastyjournal.org/article/S0883-5403%2811%2900168-9/abstract. This was completed by ''The journal of arthroplasty'' which is a funded organization and may have underlying agendas. This study neglected pain as a factor, but pain is THE LARGEST factor in rehabilitation. If a patient is in too much pain to complete therapy, he/she will shy away from progress because it will hurt too much. Decreased movement, especially in the early stages of recovery can result in the granulation of tissue and the formation of scar tissue. Once scar tissue sets in, it is nearly impossible to regain the range of motion lost due to arthrofibrosis.http://www.kneeandshoulder.md/print/print_arthro.html.For people who have had total knee replacement without complications, continuous passive motion has not been shown to provide clinically relevant benefits., which cites * CPM does not improve long-term function, long-term knee flexion, knee extension in the short or long term, and has not been shown to reduce pain and or increase quality of life. Additionally, CPM is expensive, inconvenient, and brings risk of complication while distracting patients from useful treatment. In unusual cases where the person has problems which prevent standard mobilization treatment, then CPM may be useful. Patient compliance is key to rehabilitation. Furthermore, with patients attempting at-home therapies, most follow orders with improper form that either limits improvement or in some cases, causes harm http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/1758297

Continuous passive motion (CPM) devices are used during the first phase of rehabilitation following a soft tissue surgical procedure or trauma. The goals of phase 1 rehabilitation are: control post-operative pain, reduce inflammation, provide passive motion in a specific plane of movement, and protect the healing repair or tissue. CPM is carried out by a CPM device, which constantly moves the joint through a controlled range of motion; the exact range is dependent upon the joint, but in most cases the range of motion is increased over time.
CPM is used following various types of reconstructive joint surgery such as knee replacement and ACL reconstruction. Its mechanisms of action for aiding joint recovery are dependent upon what surgery is performed. One mechanism is the movement of synovial fluid to allow for better diffusion of nutrients into damaged cartilage, and diffusion of other materials out; such as blood and metabolic waste products. Another mechanism is the prevention of fibrous scar tissue formation in the joint, which tends to decrease the range of motion for a joint. The concept was created by Robert B. Salter M.D in 1970 and, along with help from engineer John Saringer, a device was created in 1978.
==CPM Following Knee Arthroplasty==

There are contradicting studies in regards to knee CPMs. Unfortunately, many insurance companies, doctor's offices, and other medical establishments do not want to claim financial responsibility for these medical devices, especially in the United States. That being said, some research concludes that CPMs do not help the recovery process. However, these studies are designed to make CPMs fail. For example, CPMs used in conjunction with physical therapy yielded the same results as physical therapy alone. However, in this study, physical therapy was administered to patients twice a day for 18 days 〔http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/60.〕 The usual PT prescription for a #REDIRECT TKA is only twice per WEEK 〔http://www.uwhealth.org/files/uwhealth/docs/sportsmed/RE-38789-14_TKA_OP.pdf.〕 Even so, this CPM condemning study had to report their findings in favor of CPM use due to ..."improved short-term range of motion in patients with limited range of motion at the time of discharge after total knee arthroplasty when added to a semi-regular PT program.".〔http://www.uwhealth.org/files/uwhealth/docs/sportsmed/RE-38789-14_TKA_OP.pdf〕
Some CPM investigations have yielded negative feelings and results towards CPM use is due to poor usage of the device 〔http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745449/.〕
CPM efficacy is contingent on the presence of larger motion arcs. Surprisingly, the range of motion (RoM) the knee actually experiences while in a CPM machine has experienced only 68%-76% of the programmed CPM arc. These percentages should be increased throughout the rehabilitation process
, but many healthcare providers fail to follow up adequately with patients regarding this vital step of the recovery process 〔
CPMs are extremely effective in pain management. Continuous motion of a joint allows for synovial fluid to be naturally pumped throughout it. This leads to efficient nutrient delivery to the damaged area, reduced inflammation, and overall reduced pain 〔http://nemsi.uchc.edu/clinical_services/orthopaedic/totaljoint/total_knee.html.〕 A study led by Dr. Rajesh N. Maniar, MS, MCh found little difference between a very short- term study (only 3 days) the recovery of patients who did and did not use a CPM. However, he removed pain as a contributing factor 〔http://www.arthroplastyjournal.org/article/S0883-5403%2811%2900168-9/abstract.〕 This was completed by ''The journal of arthroplasty'' which is a funded organization and may have underlying agendas. This study neglected pain as a factor, but pain is THE LARGEST factor in rehabilitation. If a patient is in too much pain to complete therapy, he/she will shy away from progress because it will hurt too much. Decreased movement, especially in the early stages of recovery can result in the granulation of tissue and the formation of scar tissue. Once scar tissue sets in, it is nearly impossible to regain the range of motion lost due to arthrofibrosis.〔http://www.kneeandshoulder.md/print/print_arthro.html.〕
For people who have had total knee replacement without complications, continuous passive motion has not been shown to provide clinically relevant benefits.〔, which cites
*〕 CPM does not improve long-term function, long-term knee flexion, knee extension in the short or long term, and has not been shown to reduce pain and or increase quality of life.〔 Additionally, CPM is expensive, inconvenient, and brings risk of complication while distracting patients from useful treatment.〔 In unusual cases where the person has problems which prevent standard mobilization treatment, then CPM may be useful.〔 Patient compliance is key to rehabilitation. Furthermore, with patients attempting at-home therapies, most follow orders with improper form that either limits improvement or in some cases, causes harm 〔http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/1758297〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアでContinuous passive motion (CPM) devices are used during the first phase of rehabilitation following a soft tissue surgical procedure or trauma. The goals of phase 1 rehabilitation are: control post-operative pain, reduce inflammation, provide passive motion in a specific plane of movement, and protect the healing repair or tissue. CPM is carried out by a CPM device, which constantly moves the joint through a controlled range of motion; the exact range is dependent upon the joint, but in most cases the range of motion is increased over time.CPM is used following various types of reconstructive joint surgery such as knee replacement and ACL reconstruction. Its mechanisms of action for aiding joint recovery are dependent upon what surgery is performed. One mechanism is the movement of synovial fluid to allow for better diffusion of nutrients into damaged cartilage, and diffusion of other materials out; such as blood and metabolic waste products. Another mechanism is the prevention of fibrous scar tissue formation in the joint, which tends to decrease the range of motion for a joint. The concept was created by Robert B. Salter M.D in 1970 and, along with help from engineer John Saringer, a device was created in 1978.==CPM Following Knee Arthroplasty==There are contradicting studies in regards to knee CPMs. Unfortunately, many insurance companies, doctor's offices, and other medical establishments do not want to claim financial responsibility for these medical devices, especially in the United States. That being said, some research concludes that CPMs do not help the recovery process. However, these studies are designed to make CPMs fail. For example, CPMs used in conjunction with physical therapy yielded the same results as physical therapy alone. However, in this study, physical therapy was administered to patients twice a day for 18 days http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/60. The usual PT prescription for a TKA is only twice per WEEK http://www.uwhealth.org/files/uwhealth/docs/sportsmed/RE-38789-14_TKA_OP.pdf. Even so, this CPM condemning study had to report their findings in favor of CPM use due to ..."improved short-term range of motion in patients with limited range of motion at the time of discharge after total knee arthroplasty when added to a semi-regular PT program.".http://www.uwhealth.org/files/uwhealth/docs/sportsmed/RE-38789-14_TKA_OP.pdfSome CPM investigations have yielded negative feelings and results towards CPM use is due to poor usage of the device http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745449/. CPM efficacy is contingent on the presence of larger motion arcs. Surprisingly, the range of motion (RoM) the knee actually experiences while in a CPM machine has experienced only 68%-76% of the programmed CPM arc. These percentages should be increased throughout the rehabilitation process, but many healthcare providers fail to follow up adequately with patients regarding this vital step of the recovery process CPMs are extremely effective in pain management. Continuous motion of a joint allows for synovial fluid to be naturally pumped throughout it. This leads to efficient nutrient delivery to the damaged area, reduced inflammation, and overall reduced pain http://nemsi.uchc.edu/clinical_services/orthopaedic/totaljoint/total_knee.html. A study led by Dr. Rajesh N. Maniar, MS, MCh found little difference between a very short- term study (only 3 days) the recovery of patients who did and did not use a CPM. However, he removed pain as a contributing factor http://www.arthroplastyjournal.org/article/S0883-5403%2811%2900168-9/abstract. This was completed by ''The journal of arthroplasty'' which is a funded organization and may have underlying agendas. This study neglected pain as a factor, but pain is THE LARGEST factor in rehabilitation. If a patient is in too much pain to complete therapy, he/she will shy away from progress because it will hurt too much. Decreased movement, especially in the early stages of recovery can result in the granulation of tissue and the formation of scar tissue. Once scar tissue sets in, it is nearly impossible to regain the range of motion lost due to arthrofibrosis.http://www.kneeandshoulder.md/print/print_arthro.html.For people who have had total knee replacement without complications, continuous passive motion has not been shown to provide clinically relevant benefits., which cites * CPM does not improve long-term function, long-term knee flexion, knee extension in the short or long term, and has not been shown to reduce pain and or increase quality of life. Additionally, CPM is expensive, inconvenient, and brings risk of complication while distracting patients from useful treatment. In unusual cases where the person has problems which prevent standard mobilization treatment, then CPM may be useful. Patient compliance is key to rehabilitation. Furthermore, with patients attempting at-home therapies, most follow orders with improper form that either limits improvement or in some cases, causes harm http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/1758297」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.